Transvestia

drunk).....TV's who still can't manage to hide that black shadow despite the million and one cosmetic preparations on the market....I guess that's enough sweetness for now....will save some sugar for my next column...

love?

Susanna

Comment from Virginia: Thanks, Susanna for giving me your 0.K. to follow your column with comments. In this case it isn't to disagree with you but to say something further on the matter of voice. I too, as you know, have long been campaigning against the masculine voice coming from a "girl". I'd like to comment on those who say they feel foolish trying to talk like a GG. This is understandable if you come forth with a pseudo girlish, simpering, squeaky falsetto. But why should you feel foolish to simply sound natural in accordance with how you look. I'm strongly persuaded that such persons are not really TVs (certainly not femme-personators, FPs), but... rather are enjoying what Sheila aptly termed "whole girl fetishism". That is they don't really have any sense of a femme self but are really only men wear- ing dresses etc. The fact that they wear the whole outfit from heels to hair only puts such people one cut above the guy who has a "thing" for panties, heels or corsets. Their "thing just encompasses the whole femme wardrobe instead of one item. but it is still fetishism though of a super degree - as long as there is no feeling of the "girl within". If she is truly there she would feel even more foolish talking with a deep coarse voice than "he" would with a shrill soprano. So step back and do a little personal assessing. "Are you or ain't you" your heart knows for sure.

only

Virginia